e. st v. millay

BPAL Reviews

I kinda stopped wearing scent when I started the new job because I'm already pretty weird, didn't want to also be "the perfume lady". But some days I spend a lot of time alone, so I've gone back to it. Some from the "unreviewed" pile that I've been going with lately:

Languor: An opiate torpor, soporific, trancelike, and sublimely languid. A poet’s morphine dream, a listless journey into a gentle dream and the precipice of intoxicated madness. Paperwhite and black narcissus, three lilies, black poppy and tuberose and a hint of hypnotic opium den haze.

I have categorized this as a more "perfumey" scent because it's not based on florals or foods as far as I can smell, but according to the description above, it, uh, is based heavily on florals. It just smells nice to me, and lasts all day. I guess I get narcissus and lily? All of these flowers are ones I don't really have a particular smell memory for.

Hunger: Evokes sheer, unadulterated carnal lust. An undeniably warm and sensual scent. Black narcissus, orange blossoms, and vanilla.

I always love how extra BPAL descriptions are because I'm so basic. Smells nice! A bit like Languor, but sharper, which I think is the orange blossom. Also long-lasting, nice to sniff at in the afternoon when it's calmed down and soft.

Tushnamatay: Pure internal harmony and spiritual bliss: the perfected meditation blend.

The one I wore today and last Friday. To me, it's a very lush and blooming floral - not that I can pick out any of the notes, but it shouts "flowers!" in a way the others don't, even though they are apparently also florals. People in the forum talk about sandalwood and incense, which I think are what bring out the floral. Also, they're clues that I can't identify smells without knowing what the smells are supposed to be, lol.

Original post: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1017311.html - please comment on Dreamwidth: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1017311.html?mode=reply
e. st v. millay

Ever After is the best Cinderella adaptation, and an excellent feminist movie

and just a great movie in general

1) The stepfamily have carefully drawn characters - they aren't just stock stereotypes. Do they still fit within some pretty obvious tropes? Yes, but each one has their own motivations. The stepsisters are also intelligent, which is often not the case in more recent Cinderella movies. Marguerite is clever and her well-planned flirting would work on someone less jaded; Jacqueline is obviously presented as the less-pretty and less-clever sister, but she's never stupid. The old family retainers don't get much to do, but they have their own strength and resilience, and their own moments of emotion.

2) Danielle is set up from the start as tomboyish, fighting with Gustave in the mud, and she's never shown doing anything "girly" - most of her work on the estate is physical - but there's no dialogue pontificating on how she's not like other girls. It's clear enough from what we see that she's scrappy and that she does things (whether out of inclination or because she's ordered to) that ladies in general and her stepsisters wouldn't. Likewise, she's both intellectual (reading and internalizing Utopia) and clever (taking Henri as "anything [she] can carry"*), but she's never set up to knock down a cardboard sexist who thinks women are dumb. Essentially, the filmmakers put her strength and unconventionality into the story, rather than coming up with ways for people to announce and signpost it, apart from one line of dialogue from Henri, where he's admiring her many abilities.

3) Danielle's best friend is Gustave, who is physically less strong, generally averse to conflict, and an artist - not traditionally masculine. At the same time, he never resents her and also isn't a Nice Guy. Solidarity!

4) The costuming is top-notch. No, it's not an accurate representation of sixteenth-century French dress (it's more like fifteenth-century Florentine), but everything fits and is well-made. The details are excellent and the fabric looks real; worn clothing looks tired out from actual wear. Nothing stands out to my eyes as chintzy or cheap, or like a dozen were made from the same pattern.

5) It sticks to the Cinderella framework enough to feel familiar, but only uses it as a framework, rather than a stencil that must be filled in. Probably the biggest divergence is to make the ball the scene of Danielle being found out and rejected, the opposite of its function in the fairy tale, but using Leonardo da Vinci as the godmother and then working the godmother into the story as a mentor for both Cinderella and the prince is inspired.

I just ... really love Ever After, okay. It holds up!

* Okay, if there's one way it's not a great movie it's the use of the Roma as plot element and threat, and then a way to show how enlightened Danielle is

Original post: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1016949.html - please comment on Dreamwidth: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1016949.html?mode=reply
e. st v. millay

With a title like "The Boys" I had low expectations

Collapse )

The tl;dr is that it's sexist and racist, but mostly by omission. There are some horrifyingly bloody scenes but there's a lot more talking than violence.

I also watched the new season of GLOW, but I don't have much to say about it because I just loved it to bits. Maybe tomorrow.

Original post: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1016209.html - please comment on Dreamwidth: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1016209.html?mode=reply
e. st v. millay

Not sewing lately

I got a guitar last week! A parlor guitar, to be exact. I have never been able to play regular guitars comfortably because my torso being so short means that they're too hard to get my arm around, especially sitting down - but this is closer to a ukulele size (though still bigger than a ukulele) and fits me perfectly. I'm taking "lessons" via JustinGuitar.com, and have done A-D-E, as well as the corresponding minor chords. It's a great site! It's also pretty cool to come to learning an instrument as an adult, when you have the self-motivation to practice, particularly exercises - one of the JustinGuitar things is to do changes between two chords back and forth for a full minute, which is the kind of thing I would have found painfully stupid when I was 12 but I can see how much I improve every day from it now. Just this evening I transposed "Look For the Silver Lining" into A from E-flat and accompanied myself. So much easier than trying to do that with a piano!

I attended the opening of the Schuyler sisters exhibition at the Albany Institute last week, and it was great, but I was a bit sad to see the underbust stays from Historic Cherry Hill on display labeled as ca. 1760. Howevs, HCH posted on IG about the stays with my research, crediting me, which was very nice. You should definitely see the exhibition if you're going to be in the area.

Last Sunday, I went to Klea Blackhurst's one-woman Ethel Merman tribute show, "Everything the Traffic Will Allow," at Glimmerglass Opera. It was fantastic! I got to tell her afterward how much I love this music when she signed my CD booklet (yeah, I bought the CD - that's how much I liked it, I'm a Spotify Millennial), and I felt like we connected.

Original post: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1015861.html - please comment on Dreamwidth: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1015861.html?mode=reply
e. st v. millay

ohhhhhh myyyyyyyyyy

Today I dressed a dress form for the museum's gala, which went trickily. I'll quote myself from elsewhere:

See, the original gown I intended to use (a grey silk damask evening dress made by Moshier's of Utica around 1895) turned out to have been made for a woman whose build did not match any of the dress forms. She was rather robust, with broad shoulders and a long torso, but her waist was still somewhat narrow. I tried a male dress form first, but the waist was not small enough. I tried a female form next, and it proved impossible to get the shoulders big enough because the padding squished down and in and the bodice just kept falling off.

After more than an hour of futilely wrestling with this, I tried another dress. Needing something that didn't require much under the skirt, I tried a beautiful late-1830s evening dress made from an 18th century brocaded blue silk. A little clumsy, but so pretty. But late 1830s evening necklines are quite wide, and I ran into the same problem. On a mannequin, with a relatively full body, you have arms to help hold up a wide neckline, but on a dress form, just very soft stumps at the shoulders. Finally put it back.

Third try was another mid-1890s evening dress in various shades of purple-grey. (It was worn, according to the donor, to one of Mrs. Astor's famous New York balls with extremely restricted guest lists. It's not what I would call ball dress, though ...) This had a narrow neckline, not-too-broad shoulders, and a shorter waist, and it went on the form ... I wouldn't quite say "without a hitch", because I had to do some jiggery-pokery with the skirt to get it to stay on, and I also missed a button halfways down the bodice and had to undo and redo so many small silk buttons. But it fit and I was able to walk away, and that's the important thing.

It was a pain in the ass. But it was soooooo nice to look through hanging storage! Just ... so many beautiful things. So many fan-fronts. There's a white organdy and satin dress with short sleeves and a half-high lining, so adorable! And this luscious early 1830s dress in an intricate cotton print with a crossover. And so many pieces from this era, I can't get over it, so many details and tiny points of perfection. Honestly, I do always get kind of choked up when I see historical clothes in a collection I manage. It's hard to describe - it's like this intense feeling of gratitude that I'm able to see them close up, and admire them, and interpret them to other people. A warm glow!

Original post: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1015378.html - please comment on Dreamwidth: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1015378.html?mode=reply
e. st v. millay

(no subject)

Last night I finished reading one of the most poorly-written books I've ever fully consumed, and then I dreamed I went to Albany to meet [personal profile] ktlovely and drive to GCV with her (despite it obviously being in 100% the wrong direction to meet up with her IRL). In the dream, I had managed to curl the front of my hair into two perfect bunches with a wet set. I think this is a good omen, although for some reason I had decided to go late 1820s and wear my yellow checked dress to an 1812 event. Hmm.

Original post: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1014462.html - please comment on Dreamwidth: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1014462.html?mode=reply
e. st v. millay

(no subject)

This evening I figured out how to turn an Adobe Illustrator file into a both a plain and a tiled PDF, so I'm basically unstoppable now. The final stone in the Infinity Gauntlet. (This is especially good as the thing I thought I had to do where I imported the AI file into Photoshop was not effective.) (I should probably upgrade to proper AI instead of continuing to use the free CS2 version.)

I've been poking around drawing up the patterns for a fancy Swiss waist kind of thing (it has straps and a peplum ... I don't quite know what to call it) and a very simple ca. 1911 dress (the entire bodice is one piece, with a narrow gore under each arm). The former has lots of pieces but the latter takes a lot of paper. Not sure which is better.

Original post: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1013699.html - please comment on Dreamwidth: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1013699.html?mode=reply
e. st v. millay

(no subject)

The patterns are almost ready! I wrote the instructions tonight, and I just need to update a couple of words on the pattern itself to reflect changes I made doing the previous - I'll be printing them out tomorrow at OfficeMax, but I probably won't be able to put them in the mail until next weekend. [personal profile] robinsnest and [personal profile] atherleisure, can you PM me your addresses?


I don't think Lucifer is a particularly good show, but every so often it delivers well on the emotional iddy stuff and it does make me understand the appeal of wingfic, I guess. Also, Tom Welling got OLD and tbh I think he's hotter as a salt-and-peppery beefsteak than he was as a really old "teenager". After Tom Ellis played an amazingly sucky Claudio in the ShakespeaReTold version of Much Ado About Nothing (with Billie Piper), I didn't think I could find him sympathetic ever again, but he's good. So, grudging single thumb up.

Original post: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1013011.html - please comment on Dreamwidth: https://chocolatepot.dreamwidth.org/1013011.html?mode=reply